How do you handle a construction project that isn’t going to plan? Like the ostrich or...?
A construction project rarely goes to plan. In fact, it is more the rule than the exception that budgets and schedules on larger building and civil engineering projects are exceeded.
Studies suggest that 9 out of 10 larger projects exceed either the expected price or the expected time. But what do you do to get the project back on track?
There can be many reasons for overruns and delays, and they may be rooted very early in the project. We have repeatedly seen a situation where the design consultant has to send project documents to the precast element supplier, which then has to manufacture elements for the building. Because of time pressure, however, the design consultant has not drawn all the holes that need to be in the elements into the 3D model sent to the element supplier. This is only discovered after the elements have been installed in the building, so the holes then have to be drilled in the elements already installed. The construction project consequently becomes more expensive and is delayed as a result of the “minor” deficiency in the design.
Managing the contract – contract management
It is not unusual for a discussion to arise afterwards about who should pay for the extra costs and the delay. It can sometimes be a difficult and unpleasant task to deal with who should pay for the loss the client has suffered. As a result, the client or the client’s consultants sometimes fail to give notice (correctly or in time) of the deficient work to the design consultant or contractor in accordance with the contract and the set of rules governing it. In other words, the conflict is “saved” for later in line with the so-called “ostrich strategy”.
Playing down the conflict or saving it for later does, however, have a number of consequences. The most obvious is that the client risks losing its claim or having it reduced. Worse still, the client’s passivity may mean that an arbitral tribunal or court attaches importance to the lack of reaction. In some cases, the lack of management has led the arbitral tribunal to reject any claim for liquidated damages or compensation made by the client. Case law and arbitral practice are full of decisions in which the tribunal attaches decisive importance to the parties’ conduct.
Manage by the contract before circumstances manage your project
One of the levers the client can very obviously benefit from is to take a position on extra costs and delays and give notice in accordance with the contract, e.g. as described in AB 18 and FIDIC. This also makes it clearer where the parties stand on the delay or the extra costs. Both AB 18 and FIDIC have very clear rules on the duty to give notice.
Contractual handling of delays and extra costs – disagree professionally
Another advantage of raising claims early is that the parties can agree on how to resolve extra costs and delays. For example, acceleration can be agreed, with the outcome of any subsequent case deciding the payment for the acceleration. In this way, any claims for damages are reduced. Handling claims earlier may also make it possible to agree on optimizing the project and thereby reducing costs.
Expedited decisions
What do you do if the project has gone completely off the rails?
Prevention is always better than cure – but how?
Featured content

How do we move forward with strategic partnerships?
