When early contractor involvement drives progress
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) offers valuable inspiration if you want a smooth and efficient construction process
The architect draws, the engineer calculates, and finally the contractor is handed the finished drawings and calculations. Construction gets under way. It is a sequential process that shapes the vast majority of construction projects in Denmark. But there is a need to break out of a framework with a built-in, inflexible form of collaboration that brings a risk of cost overruns, errors and the shifting of responsibility.
If the contractor is involved while the architect’s vision for the building is still on the drawing board, the final drawings and calculations can take account of the contractor’s practical questions, needs and requirements. Closer and earlier collaboration can help shift the contractor’s focus away from the fixed profit margin and benefits the progress of the project.
We can start by involving the contractor earlier, so the construction process becomes more agile. When suppliers become partners, everyone shares the same goal, and the project can be adapted far more quickly to changing circumstances along the way.
IPD and integrated construction offer valuable inspiration if you want a smoother and more efficient construction process. Here, it is not only about involving the contractor earlier, but about seeing the construction process as a cycle of phases.
The focus shifts
-
From risk allocation to shared risk management
-
From a fixed profit margin to shared success criteria
-
From silos to knowledge sharing
-
From supplier to partner
-
From deadlock to progress
Get the agreements in place
When the right competencies come into play early, you can lay the foundation for a trusting collaboration with a shared objective. That requires a new type of agreement, which should include the following:
- A focus on goals rather than rules
- Clear interfaces for the allocation of responsibility in relation to finances, time, etc.
- As the client, you must be able to leave the collaboration at agreed points without financial consequences that have not been agreed in advance
- A fair distribution of the gain if the team reaches the agreed objectives, and clear consequences if the framework does not hold
Featured content

Participatory construction at DTU
